Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 79
Filter
1.
Fisioterapia (Madr., Ed. impr.) ; 45(6): 341-352, nov. - dec. 2023. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-226832

ABSTRACT

Introducción y objetivo Los sujetos intervenidos por artroplastia total de rodilla (ATR) muestran bajos niveles de adherencia a la rehabilitación y al ejercicio físico. El objetivo de este estudio es recopilar y revisar los efectos de las estrategias orientadas a mejorar la adherencia al ejercicio físico en la rehabilitación tras ATR. Métodos Se llevó a cabo una revisión sistemática de la literatura (Cochrane, PEDro, MedLine), incluyendo aquellos estudios que emplearan estrategias encaminadas a mejorar la adherencia a la rehabilitación tras ATR. Se analizaron los efectos de las intervenciones en términos de dolor y funcionalidad (variables primarias), así como en las variables relacionadas con la adherencia, realizando un metaanálisis a partir de las diferencias de medias estandarizadas (DME; IC95%) entre las puntuaciones de la intervención experimental y control. Resultados Se recogieron nueve estudios que incluían estrategias encaminadas a mejorar la adherencia a la rehabilitación tras ATR. El metaanálisis reveló un ligero efecto a favor del grupo experimental en términos de dolor (DME; IC95%: 0,31 [0,09-0,54], p<0,01), pero no en cuanto a la funcionalidad. Cualitativamente, los resultados relacionados con la adherencia fueron heterogéneos o inconsistentes. Conclusiones Los efectos de las estrategias empleadas para mejorar la adherencia al ejercicio físico en la rehabilitación tras ATR son heterogéneos e inconcluyentes, aunque se sugieren ligeros efectos positivos en cuanto al dolor. La diversidad de resultados en los estudios individuales y la heterogeneidad en el diseño de las intervenciones implican la necesidad de futuras investigaciones (AU)


Introduction and objectives Subjects undergoing by total knee arthroplasty (TKA) show low levels of adherence to rehabilitation and physical exercise. The aim of this study is to collect and review the effects of strategies aimed at improving adherence to physical exercise in rehabilitation after TKA. Methods A systematic review of the literature (Cochrane, PEDro, and MedLine) was carried out, including those studies that employed strategies aimed at improving adherence to rehabilitation after TKA. We analyzed the effects of the interventions in terms of pain and functionality (primary variables), as well as adherence-related variables, performing a meta-analysis based on the standardized mean differences (SMD; 95%CI) between experimental and control intervention scores. Results Nine studies were collected that included strategies aimed at improving adherence to rehabilitation after TKA. Meta-analysis revealed a slight effect in favor of the experimental group in terms of pain (SMD; 95%CI: 0.31 [0.09-0.54], P<.01]), but not in terms of functionality. Qualitatively, results related to adherence were heterogeneous or inconsistent. Conclusion The effects of strategies employed to improve adherence to physical exercise in rehabilitation after TKA are heterogeneous and inconclusive, although slight positive effects on pain are suggested. The diversity of results in the individual studies and the heterogeneity in the design of the interventions imply the need for future research (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/rehabilitation , Treatment Adherence and Compliance , Exercise
2.
BMC Vet Res ; 19(1): 211, 2023 Oct 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37853407

ABSTRACT

Cattle brucellosis is a severe zoonosis of worldwide distribution caused by Brucella abortus and B. melitensis. In some countries with appropriate infrastructure, animal tagging and movement control, eradication was possible through efficient diagnosis and vaccination with B. abortus S19, usually combined with test-and-slaughter (T/S). Although S19 elicits anti-smooth lipopolysaccharide antibodies that may interfere in the differentiation of infected and vaccinated animals (DIVA), this issue is minimized using appropriate S19 vaccination protocols and irrelevant when high-prevalence makes mass vaccination necessary or when eradication requisites are not met. However, S19 has been broadly replaced by vaccine RB51 (a rifampin-resistant rough mutant) as it is widely accepted that is DIVA, safe and as protective as S19. These RB51 properties are critically reviewed here using the evidence accumulated in the last 35 years. Controlled experiments and field evidence shows that RB51 interferes in immunosorbent assays (iELISA, cELISA and others) and in complement fixation, issues accentuated by revaccinating animals previously immunized with RB51 or S19. Moreover, contacts with virulent brucellae elicit anti-smooth lipopolysaccharide antibodies in RB51 vaccinated animals. Thus, accepting that RB51 is truly DIVA results in extended diagnostic confusions and, when combined with T/S, unnecessary over-culling. Studies supporting the safety of RB51 are flawed and, on the contrary, there is solid evidence that RB51 is excreted in milk and abortifacient in pregnant animals, thus being released in abortions and vaginal fluids. These problems are accentuated by the RB51 virulence in humans, lack diagnostic serological tests detecting these infections and RB51 rifampicin resistance. In controlled experiments, protection by RB51 compares unfavorably with S19 and lasts less than four years with no evidence that RB51-revaccination bolsters immunity, and field studies reporting its usefulness are flawed. There is no evidence that RB51 protects cattle against B. melitensis, infection common when raised together with small ruminants. Finally, data acumulated during cattle brucellosis eradication in Spain shows that S19-T/S is far more efficacious than RB51-T/S, which does not differ from T/S alone. We conclude that the assumption that RB51 is DIVA, safe, and efficaceous results from the uncritical repetition of imperfectly examined evidence, and advise against its use.


Subject(s)
Brucella Vaccine , Brucellosis , Cattle Diseases , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Cattle , Animals , Brucella abortus , Brucellosis/veterinary , Lipopolysaccharides , Abortion, Veterinary , Vaccination/veterinary , Antibodies, Bacterial
3.
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis ; 34(S1): S29-S32, 2023 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37254729

ABSTRACT

In haemophilia, screening protocols in the prevention and treatment of common lesions still require unification of criteria. Patients with haemophilia seek medical consultation exclusively for two reasons: because they have requested an appointment for a routine check-up (1-2 times a year in case of severe haemophilia) or because they have developed acute bleeding that requires treatment. The purpose of this paper is to emphasize the importance of an early differential diagnosis of joint damage and to review the techniques that allow an effective evaluation. The World Federation of Haemophilia recommends the 'Primary Prophylaxis' treatment modality, and today, severe haemophilia patients adhering to that factor VIII/IX therapy have significantly reduced common injuries: haematomas, haemarthrosis, synovitis, and haemophilic arthropathy. The basic protocols and minimum data for the control of musculoskeletal health are described. In summary, the primary goal of the haematologist-led multidisciplinary care team treating patients with haemophilia is likely to restore and/or preserve joint and musculoskeletal health, which is essential to promoting quality of life. Appropriate factor replacement regimens are required to prevent bleeding, these should be combined with physical activity and a physiotherapy program, in accordance with the recommendations of the World Health Organization for the general population.


Subject(s)
Hemophilia A , Synovitis , Humans , Hemophilia A/drug therapy , Quality of Life , Hemarthrosis/diagnostic imaging , Hemarthrosis/etiology , Synovitis/diagnostic imaging , Factor IX/therapeutic use
4.
Sci Total Environ ; 636: 670-687, 2018 Sep 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29723839

ABSTRACT

This research underlines the need to improve water management policies for areas linked to confined karstic aquifers subjected to intensive exploitation, and to develop additional efforts towards monitoring their subsidence evolution. We analyze subsidence related to intensive use of groundwater in a confined karstic aquifer, through the use of the InSAR technique, by the southern coast of Spain (Costa del Sol). Carbonates are overlain by an unconfined detritic aquifer with interlayered high transmissivity rocks, in connection with the Mediterranean Sea, where the water level is rather stable. Despite this, an accumulated deformation in the line-of-sight (LOS) direction greater than -100 mm was observed by means of the ERS-1/2 (1992-2000) and Envisat (2003-2009) satellite SAR sensors. During this period, the Costa del Sol experienced a major population increase due to the expansion of the tourism industry, with the consequent increase in groundwater exploitation. The maximum LOS displacement rates recorded during both time spans are respectively -6 mm/yr and -11 mm/yr, respectively. During the entire period, there was an accumulated descent of the confined water level of 140 m, and several fluctuations of more than 80 m correlating with the subsidence trend observed for the whole area. Main sedimentary depocenters (up to 800 m), revealed by gravity prospecting, partly coincide with areas of subsidence maxima; yet ground deformation is also influenced by other factors, the main ones being the fine-grained facies distribution and rapid urbanization due to high touristic pressure.

5.
Acta Trop ; 165: 179-193, 2017 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26551794

ABSTRACT

Brucellosis is a highly contagious zoonosis caused by bacteria of the genus Brucella and affecting domestic and wild mammals. In this paper, the bacteriological and serological evidence of brucellosis in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) and its epidemiological characteristics are discussed. The tools available for the diagnosis and treatment of human brucellosis and for the diagnosis and control of animal brucellosis and their applicability in the context of SSA are presented and gaps identified. These gaps concern mostly the need for simpler and more affordable antimicrobial treatments against human brucellosis, the development of a B. melitensis vaccine that could circumvent the drawbacks of the currently available Rev 1 vaccine, and the investigation of serological diagnostic tests for camel brucellosis and wildlife. Strategies for the implementation of animal vaccination are also discussed.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Brucella/genetics , Brucellosis/diagnosis , Brucellosis/drug therapy , Vaccination , Africa South of the Sahara/epidemiology , Animals , Brucellosis/epidemiology , Geography , Humans , Serologic Tests
6.
Prev Vet Med ; 126: 105-10, 2016 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26899897

ABSTRACT

Swine brucellosis caused by Brucella suis biovar 2 is an emerging disease in continental Europe. Without effective vaccines being available, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) recommends the full depopulation of infected herds as the only strategy to eradicate B. suis outbreaks. Using data collected from 8 herds suffering natural swine brucellosis outbreaks, we assessed the efficacy of four control strategies: (i) oxytetracycline treatment only, as a default scenario, (ii) oxytetracycline treatment combined with skin testing and removal of positive animals, (iii) oxytetracycline treatment combined with serological testing (Rose Bengal test-RBT-and indirect ELISA -iELISA-) and removal of seropositive animals and (iv) oxytetracycline treatment combined with both serological (RBT/iELISA) and skin testing and removal of positive animals. A Susceptible-Infectious-Removal model was used to estimate the reproduction ratio (R) for each strategy. According to this model, the oxytetracycline treatment alone was not effective enough to eradicate the infection. However, this antibiotic treatment combined with diagnostic testing at 4-monthly intervals plus immediate removal of positive animals showed to be effective to eradicate brucellosis independent of the diagnostic test strategy used in an acceptable time interval (1-2 years), depending on the initial number of infected animals.


Subject(s)
Animal Culling , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Brucellosis/veterinary , Oxytetracycline/therapeutic use , Swine Diseases/prevention & control , Agriculture , Animals , Brucellosis/drug therapy , Brucellosis/prevention & control , Combined Modality Therapy/veterinary , Communicable Diseases, Emerging/drug therapy , Communicable Diseases, Emerging/prevention & control , Communicable Diseases, Emerging/veterinary , Disease Eradication/methods , Europe , Swine , Swine Diseases/drug therapy
7.
Exp Appl Acarol ; 68(1): 1-20, 2016 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26471983

ABSTRACT

Dispersal can be an essential factor affecting the biological control of pests. Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) is a cosmopolitan and polyphagous species that may reach the pest status in many cropping systems including clementine orchards, where it may be found both in the trees and the associated flora. In a previous study, we demonstrated that the use of a ground cover of Festuca arundinacea Schreber (Poaceae) offered a better regulation of T. urticae populations than traditional alternatives (bare soil, multifloral wild cover). Therefore, we decided to study the ambulatory dispersal of mites crawling up and down tree trunks in a clementine mandarin orchard grown in association with a F. arundinacea cover for one season. The highest ambulatory migration rate was upward from the cover to the canopy. Multivariate regressions showed that the dynamics of T. urticae populations in the trees was strongly related to that of Phytoseiidae mites, their main natural predators. Surprisingly, canopy populations were not related to those on the ground cover or to those dispersing from it. When T. urticae individuals collected from the ground cover, the tree trunk, and the canopy were subjected to molecular analyses, the optimal number of genetic clusters (demes) was two. One clustergrouped individuals dispersed from the ground cover (e.g. collected on tree trunks) and 27.5% of individuals collected in the ground cover. The second cluster grouped all the individuals collected from trees and 72.5% of those collected in the cover. Interestingly, none of the individuals collected from the tree canopies was grouped with the first deme. This result may be taken as indicative that grass-adapted T. urticae individuals are unable to satisfactorily colonize and establish on the trees and provides evidence that host adaptation can hamper dispersal and establishment of the ground cover deme on trees, contributing to a better natural regulation of this pest species in citrus.


Subject(s)
Animal Distribution , Citrus/parasitology , Festuca/growth & development , Food Chain , Tetranychidae/physiology , Agriculture , Animals , Citrus/growth & development , Pest Control, Biological
8.
J Microbiol Methods ; 111: 57-63, 2015 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25661496

ABSTRACT

Swine brucellosis caused by Brucella suis biovar 2 is an emerging disease in Europe. Currently used diagnostic tests for swine brucellosis detect antibodies to the O-polysaccharide (O-PS) of Brucella smooth lipopolysaccharide (S-LPS) but their specificity is compromised by false-positive serological reactions (FPSRs) when bacteria carrying cross-reacting O-PS infect pigs. FPSRs occur throughout Europe, and the only tool available for a specific B. suis diagnosis is the intradermal test with Brucella protein extracts free of O-PS or S-LPS. Using sera of 162 sows naturally infected by B. suis biovar 2, 406 brucellosis-free sows, and 218 pigs of brucellosis-free farms affected by FPSR, we assessed the diagnostic performance of an indirect ELISA with rough LPS (thus devoid of O-PS) and of gel immunodiffusion, counterimmunoelectrophoresis, latex agglutination and indirect ELISA with O-PS free proteins in comparison with several S-LPS tests (Rose Bengal, complement fixation, gel immunodiffusion and indirect ELISA). When adjusted to 100% specificity, the sensitivity of the rough LPS ELISA was very low (30%), and adoption of other cut-offs resulted in poor specificity/sensitivity ratios. Although their specificity was 100%, the sensitivity of protein tests (ELISA, latex agglutination, counterimmunoelectrophoresis, and gel immunodiffusion) was only moderate (45, 58, 61 and 63%, respectively). Among S-LPS tests, gel immunodiffusion was the only test showing acceptable sensitivity/specificity (68 and 100%, respectively). Despite these shortcomings, and when the purpose is to screen out FPSR at herd level, gel immunodiffusion tests may offer a technically simple and practical alternative to intradermal testing.


Subject(s)
Brucella suis/isolation & purification , Brucellosis/veterinary , Serologic Tests/standards , Swine Diseases/diagnosis , Animals , Brucellosis/diagnosis , Complement Fixation Tests , Counterimmunoelectrophoresis , Cross Reactions , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Europe , False Positive Reactions , Immunodiffusion , Intradermal Tests , Latex Fixation Tests , Rose Bengal , Sensitivity and Specificity , Swine
9.
J Vet Pharmacol Ther ; 38(4): 357-64, 2015 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25413993

ABSTRACT

The aim of this work was developing effective treatments against Brucella suis biovar 2, responsible for swine brucellosis in Europe. MICs for antibiotics used classically in brucellosis and two new macrolides (tulathromycin and tildipirosin) were determined for 33 B. suis biovar 2 field and B. suis reference strains. MIC90 values ranged from 0.01 to 0.25 µg/mL. The best candidates, given alone or combined, were then evaluated in mice. Ten groups (n = 7) of BALB/c mice were inoculated (1 × 10(5) CFU/mouse) with a virulent B. suis biovar 2 field strain. All groups, excepting untreated control, were treated for 14 days with, respectively, doxycycline, dihydrostreptomycin, tulathromycin (one or two doses), or tildipirosin (one or two doses) given alone, and doxycycline combined with dihydrostreptomycin, tulathromycin, or tildipirosin. Combined tildipirosin treatment was the most effective, then selected for pig studies. Sixteen B. suis biovar 2 naturally infected sows were treated with oxytetracycline (20 mg/kg BW/daily) for 21 days. The half of these received also tildipirosin (4 mg/kg BW) in two doses with a 10-day interval. An extensive bacteriological study conducted ten days after ceasing treatments proved the efficacy of this combined oxytetracycline/tildipirosin treatment.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Brucellosis/veterinary , Disaccharides/therapeutic use , Heterocyclic Compounds/therapeutic use , Swine Diseases/drug therapy , Tylosin/analogs & derivatives , Animals , Brucella suis , Brucellosis/drug therapy , Brucellosis/microbiology , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Mice , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Oxytetracycline/administration & dosage , Oxytetracycline/therapeutic use , Swine , Swine Diseases/microbiology , Tylosin/administration & dosage , Tylosin/therapeutic use
10.
Vet Immunol Immunopathol ; 163(1-2): 77-85, 2015 Jan 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25480681

ABSTRACT

Current serological tests for swine brucellosis detect antibodies to the Brucella O-polysaccharide (O/PS). However, when infections by bacteria carrying cross-reacting O/PS occur, these tests suffer from false positive serological reactions (FPSR), and the skin test with Brucella soluble protein extracts is the best diagnostic alternative to differentiate true Brucella suis infections from FPSR in pigs. Since this test has been seldom used in B. suis infected swine, the clinical and histological features involved have not been described properly. Here, we describe the clinical and histological events in B. suis biovar 2 infected pigs skin tested with a cytosoluble O/PS free protein extract from rough Brucella abortus Tn5::per mutant. A similar extract from rough Ochrobactrum intermedium was also used for comparative purposes. No relevant differences were evidenced between the homologous and heterologous allergens, and the main clinical feature was an elevated area of the skin showing different induration degrees. Moreover, an important vascular reaction with hyperemia and haemorrhage was produced in most infected sows 24-48 h after inoculation, thus facilitating the clinical interpretation of positive reactions. Histologically, combined immediate (type III) and delayed (type IV) hypersensitivity reactions were identified as the most relevant feature of the inflammatory responses produced.


Subject(s)
Antigens, Bacterial , Brucella suis , Brucellosis/veterinary , Swine Diseases/pathology , Animals , Antigens, Bacterial/immunology , Brucella abortus/immunology , Brucella suis/immunology , Brucellosis/diagnosis , Brucellosis/immunology , Brucellosis/pathology , Cross Reactions/immunology , False Positive Reactions , Female , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/diagnosis , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/immunology , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/veterinary , Ochrobactrum/immunology , Skin/immunology , Skin/pathology , Skin Tests/veterinary , Swine/immunology , Swine/microbiology , Swine Diseases/diagnosis , Swine Diseases/immunology , Swine Diseases/microbiology
11.
Vet Microbiol ; 168(1): 161-8, 2014 Jan 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24331743

ABSTRACT

Swine brucellosis by Brucella suis biovar 2 is an emerging disease whose control is based on serological testing and culling. However, current serological tests detect antibodies to the O-polysaccharide (O/PS) moiety of Brucella smooth lipopolysaccharide (S-LPS), and thus lack specificity when infections by Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 and other gram-negative bacteria carrying cross-reacting O/PS occur. The skin test with the protein-rich brucellin extract obtained from rough B. melitensis B115 is assumed to be specific for discriminating these false positive serological reactions (FPSR). However, B115 strain, although unable to synthesize S-LPS, accumulates O/PS internally, which could cause diagnostic problems. Since the brucellin skin test has been seldom used in pigs and FPSR are common in these animals, we assessed its performance using cytosoluble protein extracts obtained from B. abortus rough mutants in manBcore or per genes (critical for O/PS biosynthesis) and B. melitensis B115. The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were determined in B. suis biovar 2 culture positive and brucellosis free sows, and apparent prevalence in sows of unknown individual bacteriological and serological status belonging to B. suis biovar 2 naturally infected herds. Moreover, the specificity in discriminating brucellosis from FPSR was assessed in brucellosis free boars showing FPSR. The skin test with B. abortus ΔmanBcore and B. melitensis B115 allergens performed similarly, and the former one resulted in 100% specificity when testing animals showing FPSR in indirect ELISA, Rose Bengal and complement fixation serological tests. We conclude that O/PS-free genetically defined mutants represent an appropriate alternative to obtain Brucella protein extracts for diagnosing swine brucellosis.


Subject(s)
Allergens , Bacterial Proteins , Brucella abortus/genetics , Brucella/metabolism , Brucellosis/diagnosis , Skin Tests/veterinary , Swine Diseases/diagnosis , Animals , Brucella/immunology , Brucella abortus/immunology , Brucellosis/immunology , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/veterinary , Female , Male , Mutation , Sensitivity and Specificity , Serologic Tests/veterinary , Skin Tests/standards , Swine
12.
Rev Sci Tech ; 32(1): 27-42, 2013 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23837363

ABSTRACT

The epidemiological link between brucellosis in wildlife and brucellosis in livestock and people is widely recognised. When studying brucellosis in wildlife, three questions arise: (i) Is this the result of a spillover from livestock or a sustainable infection in one or more host species of wildlife? (ii) Does wildlife brucellosis represent a reservoir of Brucella strains for livestock? (iii) Is it of zoonotic concern? Despite their different host preferences, B. abortus and B. suis have been isolated from a variety of wildlife species, whereas B. melitensis is rarely reported in wildlife. The pathogenesis of Brucella spp. in wildlife reservoirs is not yet fully defined. The prevalence of brucellosis in some wildlife species is very low and thus the behaviour of individual animals, and interactions between wildlife and livestock, may be the most important drivers for transmission. Since signs of the disease are non-pathognomonic, definitive diagnosis depends on laboratory testing, including indirect tests that can be applied to blood or milk, as well as direct tests (classical bacteriology and methods based on the polymerase chain reaction [PCR]). However, serological tests cannot determine which Brucella species has induced anti-Brucella antibodies in the host. Only the isolation of Brucella spp. (or specific DNA detection by PCR) allows a definitive diagnosis, using classical or molecular techniques to identify and type specific strains. There is as yet no brucellosis vaccine that demonstrates satisfactory safety and efficacy in wildlife. Therefore, controlling brucellosis in wildlife should be based on good management practices. At present, transmission of Brucella spp. from wildlife to humans seems to be linked to the butchering of meat and dressing of infected wild or feral pig carcasses in thedeveloped world, and infected African buffalo in the developing world. In the Arctic, the traditional consumption of raw bone marrow and the internal organs of freshly killed caribou or reindeer is an important risk factor.


Subject(s)
Animals, Wild , Brucella/isolation & purification , Brucellosis/veterinary , Animals , Brucellosis/epidemiology , Global Health , Humans , Livestock , Risk Factors , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Zoonoses
13.
Prev Vet Med ; 102(2): 118-31, 2011 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21571380

ABSTRACT

Following the recent discovery of new Brucella strains from different animal species and from the environment, ten Brucella species are nowadays included in the genus Brucella. Although the intracellular trafficking of Brucella is well described, the strategies developed by Brucella to survive and multiply in phagocytic and non-phagocytic cells, particularly to access nutriments during its intracellular journey, are still largely unknown. Metabolism and virulence of Brucella are now considered to be two sides of the same coin. Mechanisms presiding to the colonization of the pregnant uterus in different animal species are not known. Vaccination is the cornerstone of control programs in livestock and although the S19, RB51 (both in cattle) and Rev 1 (in sheep and goats) vaccines have been successfully used worldwide, they have drawbacks and thus the ideal brucellosis vaccine is still very much awaited. There is no vaccine available for pigs and wildlife. Animal brucellosis control strategies differ in the developed and the developing world. Most emphasis is put on eradication and on risk analysis to avoid the re-introduction of Brucella in the developed world. Information related to the prevalence of brucellosis is still scarce in the developing world and control programs are rarely implemented. Since there is no vaccine available for humans, prevention of human brucellosis relies on its control in the animal reservoir. Brucella is also considered to be an agent to be used in bio- and agroterrorism attacks. At the animal/ecosystem/human interface it is critical to reduce opportunities for Brucella to jump host species as already seen in livestock, wildlife and humans. This task is a challenge for the future in terms of veterinary public health, as for wildlife and ecosystem managers and will need a "One Health" approach to be successful.


Subject(s)
Brucella/isolation & purification , Brucellosis/veterinary , Zoonoses/microbiology , Animals , Brucellosis/epidemiology , Brucellosis/microbiology , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Zoonoses/epidemiology
14.
J Clin Microbiol ; 49(4): 1458-63, 2011 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21270216

ABSTRACT

Bacteriological diagnosis of brucellosis is performed by culturing animal samples directly on both Farrell medium (FM) and modified Thayer-Martin medium (mTM). However, despite inhibiting most contaminating microorganisms, FM also inhibits the growth of Brucella ovis and some B. melitensis and B. abortus strains. In contrast, mTM is adequate for growth of all Brucella species but only partially inhibitory for contaminants. Moreover, the performance of both culture media for isolating B. suis has never been established properly. We first determined the performance of both media for B. suis isolation, proving that FM significantly inhibits B. suis growth. We also determined the susceptibility of B. suis to the antibiotics contained in both selective media, proving that nalidixic acid and bacitracin are highly inhibitory, thus explaining the reduced performance of FM for B. suis isolation. Based on these results, a new selective medium (CITA) containing vancomycin, colistin, nystatin, nitrofurantoin, and amphotericin B was tested for isolation of the main Brucella species, including B. suis. CITA's performance was evaluated using reference contaminant strains but also field samples taken from brucella-infected animals or animals suspected of infection. CITA inhibited most contaminant microorganisms but allowed the growth of all Brucella species, to levels similar to those for both the control medium without antibiotics and mTM. Moreover, CITA medium was more sensitive than both mTM and FM for isolating all Brucella species from field samples. Altogether, these results demonstrate the adequate performance of CITA medium for the primary isolation of the main Brucella species, including B. suis.


Subject(s)
Bacteriological Techniques/methods , Brucella/isolation & purification , Brucellosis/diagnosis , Brucellosis/veterinary , Culture Media/chemistry , Animals , Anti-Infective Agents/pharmacology , Brucella/drug effects , Brucella/growth & development , Humans , Selection, Genetic
15.
Rev Sci Tech ; 30(3): 809-19, 2011 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22435193

ABSTRACT

The World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) requested an International Standard anti-Brucella melitensis Serum (ISaBmS) to standardise diagnostic tests and reagents for sheep and goats. The agreed criteria were the highest dilution (in negative serum) of the standard which must give a positive result and the lowest dilution (in negative serum) which must simultaneously give a negative result. The two dilutions for each assay were, respectively: indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (iELISA) 1/64 and 1/750, competitive ELISA (cELISA) 1/8 and 1/300, fluorescent polarisation assay (FPA) 1/16 and 1/200, Rose Bengal test (RBT) 1/16 and 1/200. The OIE International Standard Serum (OIEISS) will remain the primary standard for the RBT; the ISaBmS is an additional standard. It was impossible to set criteria for the complement fixation test, therefore the OIEISS will remain the primary standard. The ISaBmS can be used to standardise iELISA, cELISA and FPA to diagnose sheep and goat brucellosis. This standard should facilitate harmonisation of tests used for brucellosis surveillance and international trade in these species.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Bacterial/blood , Brucella melitensis/immunology , Brucellosis/veterinary , Goat Diseases/diagnosis , Immune Sera/blood , Analysis of Variance , Animals , Brucellosis/diagnosis , Complement Fixation Tests/veterinary , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/veterinary , Female , Fluorescence Polarization Immunoassay/veterinary , Goats , Pregnancy , Reference Standards , Sheep , Sheep Diseases/diagnosis
16.
Prilozi ; 31(1): 145-65, 2010.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20703189

ABSTRACT

AIM: To describe the various strategies for the control and eradication of B. melitensis infection in sheep and goats. METHODS: The advantages and drawbacks of these strategies are discussed on the basis of the author's personal experience and a revision of the relevant literature. RESULTS: Vaccination programmes in various combinations can be applied either to decrease the prevalence of infection in the animal population or, when combined with adequate complementary eradication measures, to achieve a brucellosis-free status. CONCLUSION: Controlling the disease should be the primary goal of the veterinary services involved. However, eradication should be the final objective of any control programme implemented. The selection of an eradication or control strategy is of paramount relevance, and a frequent cause of controversy among decision-makers. The final strategy should be established according to the quality of the veterinary services organisation, the economic resources available and the extent and prevalence of disease. Cooperation with farmers is essential to succeed with the application of even the most elementary control programme. When brucellosis is highly prevalent, mass (whole-flock) vaccination is the choice to control the disease, independently of the socioeconomic situation. Once effective control of the disease has been accomplished, its eradication is feasible. For successful eradication, the adequate quality and organisation of veterinary services, the strict control of animal movements and the provision of adequate economic compensation to affected farmers are compulsory. When the disease is fully eradicated, a surveillance strategy has to be implemented for the early detection of eventual new outbreaks or disease reintroduction.


Subject(s)
Brucella melitensis , Brucellosis/prevention & control , Brucellosis/veterinary , Communicable Disease Control/methods , Disease Eradication/methods , Mass Vaccination , Animals , Goats , Sheep
18.
Vaccine ; 27(2): 187-91, 2009 Jan 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19007836

ABSTRACT

Brucella melitensis Rev.1 is the most effective vaccine against B. ovis infection in sheep but induces antibodies interfering with B. melitensis diagnosis. Brucella BP26 and Omp31 proteins are differential diagnostic antigens. Single or double bp26 and omp31 Rev.1 deletion mutants have been proven effective against B. melitensis in sheep. Here, the CGV26 (deleted in bp26 gene) and CGV2631 (deleted in both bp26 and omp31 genes) mutants have been tested for efficacy against B. ovis in rams. Either inoculated subcutaneously or conjunctivally, both mutants conferred significant protection against B. ovis. The protection induced by CGV26 was similar to that of Rev.1 but significantly higher than that conferred by CGV2631. In conclusion, the CGV26 mutant, in association with the adequate diagnostic strategy, could be a useful alternative to Rev.1 for sheep vaccination against B. ovis infections in those countries performing simultaneously B. melitensis and B. ovis eradication campaigns.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Outer Membrane Proteins/genetics , Bacterial Vaccines/administration & dosage , Brucella ovis/immunology , Brucellosis/veterinary , Gene Deletion , Membrane Proteins/genetics , Sheep Diseases/prevention & control , Animals , Bacterial Vaccines/genetics , Bacterial Vaccines/immunology , Brucella melitensis/genetics , Brucella melitensis/immunology , Brucellosis/microbiology , Brucellosis/prevention & control , Immunization/veterinary , Male , Mutation , Sheep , Sheep Diseases/immunology , Sheep Diseases/microbiology , Treatment Outcome
19.
J Clin Microbiol ; 46(10): 3484-7, 2008 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18716225

ABSTRACT

An evaluation of a multiplex PCR assay (Bruce-ladder) was performed in seven laboratories using 625 Brucella strains from different animal and geographical origins. This robust test can differentiate in a single step all of the classical Brucella species, including those found in marine mammals and the S19, RB51, and Rev.1 vaccine strains.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Typing Techniques , Brucella/classification , Brucella/genetics , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Animals , DNA Primers/genetics , Humans , Mammals
20.
Actas Urol Esp ; 31(7): 719-31, 2007.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17902464

ABSTRACT

The perineum is formed by muscle-aponeurotic elements that are integrated under the control of the nervous system. Their alterations are responsible for urogynecological, coloproctologic and sexual pathologies. In order to obtain a successful treatment, it is obliged not to forget the role that plays the perineum in those pathologies. The treatment of the dysfunction of the pelvic floor groups conservative techniques and procedures like changes in life habits, behavioural therapy, biofeedback, electroestimulation (neuromodulation and peripheral electrical stimulation) and training with muscular exercises of the pelvic floor (perineal rehabilitation). The objective of all of them is to improve or to obtain the urinary continence, the strengthening of its musculature to be able to balance pelvic static, to improve the local vascularization and the anorrectal function besides securing a satisfactory sexuality.


Subject(s)
Pelvic Floor/physiopathology , Urinary Incontinence/therapy , Biofeedback, Psychology , Electric Stimulation Therapy/instrumentation , Electric Stimulation Therapy/methods , Equipment Design , Female , Humans , Life Style , Urinary Incontinence/rehabilitation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...